If I worked with just one language, this might be acceptable to me but my work crosses a lot of domains and at the end of the day, only Make seems to pull it all together.Īgain all that says is that you know Make really well. Make can simplify some things that you may not be able to do as easily in other systems, but that comes with its own costs. The same may not be true for every set of needs and skill-sets. For you it's obviously going to take more work than it will with make, since you already know make. There is absolutely no reason you could not learn to use each of those 10 different build systems to handle anything you would want to handle in make. Make itself is a language, it's just one whose syntax happens to be suited for how you build projects.

What if I don't want to learn 10 different build systems for 10 different languages? (from pmake's manpage on my slackware linux machine this pmake is the one that the netbsd community has evolved, not the one from the openbsd community which is not as good) ‘*D’ are permitted for compatibility with AT&T System V UNIX IMPSRC The name/path of the source from which the target is toīe transformed (the ``implied'' source) also known asīackward compatibility with historical makefiles and are not rec‐ And people are missing out the fact that there are different implementations of make out there.

Reddit makefile for windows 7